RRML - Comparative assessment of bone regeneration by histometry and a histological scoring system

Main page
News
RJLabM Credits
Archive
- Current issue
- Ahead of print
- List of published issues
- 2024
  - Nr.1/2024
- 2023
  - Nr.4/2023
  - Nr.3/2023
  - Nr.2/2023
  - Nr.1/2023
  - Supplement 1/2023
- 2022
  - Nr.4/2022
  - Nr.3/2022
  - Nr.2/2022
  - Nr.1/2022
  - Supplement 1/2022
- 2021
  - Nr.4/2021
  - Nr.3/2021
  - Nr.2/2021
  - Nr.1/2021
- 2020
  - Nr.4/2020
  - Nr.3/2020
  - Nr.2/2020
  - Nr.1/2020
  - Supplement 1/2020
- 2019
  - Nr.4/2019
  - Nr.3/2019
  - Nr.2/2019
  - Nr.1/2019
  - Supplement 1/2019
- 2018
  - Nr.4/2018
  - Nr.3/2018
  - Nr.2/2018
  - Nr.1/2018
  - Supplement 1/2018
  - Supplement 2/2018
  - Supplement 3/2018
- 2017
  - Nr.4/2017
  - Nr.3/2017
  - Nr.2/2017
  - Nr.1/2017
  - Supplement 1/2017
- 2016
  - Nr.4/2016
  - Nr.3/2016
  - Nr.2/2016
  - Nr.1/2016
  - Supplement 1/2016
- 2015
  - Nr.4/2015
  - Nr.3/2015
  - Nr.2/2015
  - Nr.1/2015
  - Supplement 1/2015
- 2014
  - Nr.4/2014
  - Nr.3/2014
  - Nr.2/2014
  - Nr.1/2014
  - Supplement 1/2014
- 2013
  - Nr.4/2013
  - Nr.3/2013
  - Nr.2/2013
  - Nr.1/2013
  - Supplement 1/2013
- 2012
  - Nr.4/2012
  - Nr.3/2012
  - Nr.2/2012
  - Nr.1/2012
  - Supplement 1/2012
- 2011
  - Nr.4/2011
  - Nr.3/2011
  - Nr.2/2011
  - Nr.1/2011
  - Supplement 1/2011
- 2010
  - Nr.4/2010
  - Nr.3/2010
  - Nr.2/2010
  - Nr.1/2010
  - Supplement 1/2010
- 2009
  - Nr.4/2009
  - Nr.3/2009
  - Nr.2/2009
  - Nr.1/2009
  - Supplement 1/2009
- 2008
  - Nr.4/2008
  - Nr.3/2008
  - Nr.2/2008
  - Nr.1/2008
  - Supplement 1/2008
- 2007
  - Nr.4/2007
  - Nr.3/2007
  - Nr.2/2007
  - Nr.1/2007
- 2006
  - Nr.4/2006
  - Nr.3/2006
  - Nr.2/2006
  - Nr.1/2006
- 2005
  - Nr.1/2005
Instructions for authors
Online applications
- Send an article
- Online payments
Editorial
About us
Links

ISSN online: 2284-5623

ISSN-L: 1841-6624

Rejection rate (2020): 75%

Journal Metrics

Impact Factor 0.5
Five Year Impact Factor 0.5
JCI 0.12

Top 10 downloaded articles - April 2024 -

A comprehensive review of Prof...	24
Recomandarea comună EFLM-COLA...	13
Monocyte to high-density lipop...	9
Anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) ...	9
Understanding the key differen...	7
Understanding the pathogenesis...	7
Function of the S1P pathway in...	6
Predictive value of expression...	5
The importance of tumor marker...	4
Romanian Review of Laboratory ...	4

Concept, Design & Programming
Dr. Adrian Man

Nr. 23(1)/2015 DOI:10.1515/rrlm-2015-0009

Comparative assessment of bone regeneration by histometry and a histological scoring system

Ondine Lucaciu, Dan Gheban, Olga Soriţau, Mihaela Băciuţ, Radu Septimiu Câmpian, Grigore Băciuţ

Abstract:

Objective: The aim of this research is to evaluate the value of the histological score based on a histological record compared to the histometry for monitoring cranial bone defect healing. Methods: We designed a case -control study with a control and a study group. For a number of 60 CD1 mice representing the study group, a bone defect in the cranial bone was surgically induced and grafted with bone grafts obtained by tissue engineering. Bone grafts were obtained using embryonic stem cells seeded on a scaffold obtained from the red deer antler, and osteogenic basal and complex medium was used as differentiation medium. For other 30 CD1 mice representing the control group, a bone defect in the cranial bone was induced and left to heal without grafts. The regeneration process was assessed after 2 and 4 months using the histological healing scoring system and histometry. Results: The healing score was statistically significantly correlated with the defect size obtained by means of histometry (p<0.001). The evaluation of the parameters comprised in the healing score shows that regeneration of the bone diastasis was the most advanced in the group sacrificed at 4 months after plasty, which employed embryonic stem cells, a complex osteogenic differentiation medium and deer antler as scaffold. Conclusion: histological method based on a histological score is a valuable quantification system of bone regeneration comparable to histometry. Clinical Relevance: This study proves that the presented histological score can help the clinician in the process of bone regeneration evaluation.

Keywords: tissue engineering, histometry, bone healing, stem cells, histological scoring system

Received: 14.8.2014
Accepted: 2.3.2015
Published: 12.3.2015

Download full text PDF
(1345 KB)

Lucaciu O, Gheban D, Soriţau O, Băciuţ M, Câmpian RS, Băciuţ G. Comparative assessment of bone regeneration by histometry and a histological scoring system. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2015;23(1):31-45. DOI:10.1515/rrlm-2015-0009